Legacy Store

Free Fire

Free Fire
  • First released: December 8, 2017
  • Versions: 8 archived
  • Installable: 7 of 8

Requirements: Compatible with iPhone and iPod touch. Requires iOS 8.0 or later.

Something off?

Report an issue
×

Report an issue

Noticed something wrong with Free Fire or a download? Leave a note.

Cancel
Sort by Date
Show everything
To install apps directly onto this device, it must be jailbroken with AppSync installed.
1.22.1 (2018090100)
Requires iOS 8.0+
No file in the archive for this version
Download
1.59.1 (2019114132)
Requires iOS 8.0+
737.4 MB Install Download
1.69.1 (2019114915)
Requires iOS 13.0+
January 19, 2022
719.1 MB Install Download
1.80.0 (2019115047)
Requires iOS 9.0+
March 23, 2022
466.0 MB Install Download 1 more copy
Free Fire 1.80.0.ipa · 613.9 MB Encrypted Install Download
1.105.1 (2019117510)
Requires iOS 11.0+
June 26, 2024
507.9 MB Install Download
1.118.1 (2019119027)
Requires iOS 11.0+
October 29, 2025
469.1 MB Install Download
1.120.1 (2019119620)
Requires iOS 11.0+
January 14, 2026
495.4 MB Install Download 1 more copy
[decrypt.download] [decrypt.download] com.dts.freefireth-1.120.1.ipa · 495.4 MB Install Download
1.123.1 (2019120273)
Requires iOS 12.0+
April 8, 2026
459.9 MB Install Download 1 more copy
[decrypt.download] [decrypt.download] com.dts.freefireth-1.123.1.ipa · 459.9 MB Install Download

Bundle Size Over Time

Bundle size over time719.1 MB — January 19, 2022. 466.0 MB — March 23, 2022. 507.9 MB — June 26, 2024. 469.1 MB — October 29, 2025. 495.4 MB — January 14, 2026. 459.9 MB — April 8, 2026179.8 MB359.5 MB539.3 MB719.1 MB719.1 MB — January 19, 2022466.0 MB — March 23, 2022507.9 MB — June 26, 2024469.1 MB — October 29, 2025495.4 MB — January 14, 2026459.9 MB — April 8, 2026Jan 2022Apr 2026

Chart History

Top Grossing View chart ›
Peaked at #19 (October 29, 2020) · 11 archived captures · Jul 2019 – Sep 2022
Top Grossing · Games View chart ›
Peaked at #2 (June 26, 2021) · 27 archived captures · Jun 2021 – Sep 2021
Top Grossing · Games · iPad View chart ›
Peaked at #23 (July 21, 2021) · 27 archived captures · Jun 2021 – Sep 2021
Top Free · Games View chart ›
Peaked at #59 (August 5, 2021) · 25 archived captures · Jun 2021 – Aug 2021
Top Free · Games · iPad View chart ›
Peaked at #100 (August 30, 2021) · 4 archived captures · Jun 2021 – Aug 2021

Archived Reviews

8 of 25
Chịu game
     
by Phú la · July 13, 2026

Hack nhiều vcl mà đéo ban,dù có tố cáo chục lần r vẫn ko ban,sáng giờ gặp 5 đứa hack rồi,chịu game làm ăn như này thì Game nát,mong ban hết hack và trả lại 7 sao cho tôi

Game cho kid chơi
     
by Bin siêu mạnh · July 12, 2026

Chán đéo có gì để nói

Cút
     
by Djdudjdjwoaooaoa · July 13, 2026

Cút

Сардор
     
by Khalim_202ss · July 12, 2026

Очень приколиный и классный игра мне нравится я готов каждый день в это играть если конечно время будет

Disgusting
     
by Mitu aktar · July 13, 2026

So bad and so disgusting don’t play this never ever

Game quá nhiều lỗi
     
by Pqpaoakndndkdosn · July 13, 2026

Lỗi damage , lỗi cứu bằng hòm trong nhà , mong nhà làm game có thế sửa

Stars in the game
     
by Ouilteur · July 12, 2026

I think it would be better if players who earn a Gold Star kept their star even when their team loses. The Gold Star is meant to recognize the best individual performance on the team, so it doesn’t seem fair to take away progress because of something that isn’t entirely under that player’s control. Team-based games naturally depend on the performance of everyone, and one player can’t carry every match. <br/><br/>For example, I recently had a ranked CS game where I got 11 kills while I was at 163 stars. Even though I earned the Gold Star, I only received star protection because my team lost. That felt discouraging because I did everything I reasonably could to help my team win. Rewarding strong individual performance, even in a loss, would make the ranking system feel fairer and encourage players to keep trying their best until the very end instead of feeling like their efforts don’t matter if the team loses.<br/><br/>This version is more persuasive while staying respectful and focused on the fairness of rewarding individual performance.

.
     
by Srhahahdhd · July 12, 2026

Mejora los emparejamientos, al menos has algo

Period reviews recovered from Apple's customer-review feeds via the Wayback Machine.